.
[CIC]
[Curriculum]

 

CHECK LIST FOR CPD AND BHS

COURSE REVIEW PROCESS

 

COURSE

DATE

 

PURPOSE OF CONDUCTING COURSE REVIEW PROCESS

 

It is important for counselors to periodically review curriculum for CPD and BHS courses so content remains current and course competencies continue to address desired learning outcomes for students. Curriculum should reflect significant changes in our society along with changes occurring within our student population.

 

When ad hoc groups review CPD and BHS courses, attention should be given to having well-written course descriptions, clear and measurable competencies, and outlines that reflect course content and support competencies. It is important to determine if the course is appropriately titled and whether corequisites and prerequisites should become a consideration. There are certainly occasions when courses have been eliminated entirely from the course bank. This review process may result in additions, deletions, modifications or no change at this time. Those who teach the course are in the best positions to make these determinations.

 

Curricula is never stagnant so your participation in "tending" to counseling and behavioral health courses is a vital part of meeting the needs of students enrolled in credit classes.

 

 

*REVIEW OF COMMON COURSE ELEMENTS

 

COURSE DESCRIPTION

Communicates the content of a course. It is critical that the review process starts here since all other common elements flow from the course description.

 

COURSE TITLE

Identifies the course and differentiates it from similar ones.

 

COURSE PREREQUISITES OR COREQUISITES

Defines requirements students must meet prior to or during enrollment in the course.

 

COMPETENCIES

Describes skills or attitudes students are expected to possess or behaviors they are expected to exhibit as a result of completing the course successfully.

 

Effective Course Competencies

    Observable: Describes what learners will be able to do; for example, write, solve, describe rather than internal processes such as learn, understand, know.
    Measurable: States how learners demonstrate acquired the skills, behaviors or attitudes.
    Relevant: Relates directly to course content and outline.
    Well-written: Uses concise statements written clearly and avoids the use of jargon.
    Worthwhile: Includes skills, behaviors, and attitudes that learners will actually use in life or those needed to acquire another useful skill.
 

OUTLINE:

    Reflects what will be covered in the course and should include the exact information students need to achieve the course competencies.

 

Criteria for well-designed course content outline:

1. Congruent with competencies
2. Major points are matched to one or more competencies.
3. Content is listed in the same sequence as the competencies
4. Teaching activities, learning strategies and class activities are not
included in outline.
5. Traditional outline form follows: Roman numerals (I,II,III);
Alphabetic subheadings (A,B,C); Arabic number subheadings (1,2,3)
 

*Content taken from curriculum handouts prepared by Maricopa Center for Learning Instruction (MCLI).

 


 

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM AD HOC REVIEW GROUP

 

REVIEWED WITH NO CHANGES

Comments:

 

 

 

 

Please forward a copy of the course review sheet to the chair of Counseling Curriculum Committee. Counseling Instructional Council will be notified that the review process was completed and no course modifications/deletions are forthcoming.

REVIEWED WITH CHANGES

    • Changes should be written out and attached to the course review checklist. Include both the current and revised course description, competencies and outline. Forward these documents to the chair of Counseling Curriculum Committee. Counseling Instructional Council will be notified that the review process was completed and course modifications/deletions are forthcoming.

 

    • The leader of the ad hoc review group contacts their campus curriculum technician to start the course modification process which starts with the campus and ultimately ends with MCCD Board approval.

 

 

 

REVIEW LEADER

 

Counselors participating in review process

 

CURRICULUM COMMITTEE CHAIR

8/00

 

[CGC]
[EMC]
[GWC]
[GC]
[MC]
[PVC]
[PC]
[RIO]
[SC]
[SMC]

Committees of the Council
Hiring Qualifications Professional
Development
Research Technology


Content by Ava Jensen
Web Design by Sean Robinson
HTML Maintained by Barbara Bentz
Copyright 2000 by Scottsdale Community College
Last modified on November 2, 2000
Disclaimer